It is “jobbigt” to be at job

** this post is work in progress **
Many moons ago, it was customary to marry someone from the the richer family. The rich got married into people who were after the money, having money meant better possibilities to formulate the families. The need for money, created the need to marry.

Nowadays, when the general level of income and living is OK in general it has created situation where people actually do not want to get married anymore. Lot of single mothers opt out from the burden of living together with men (as well).

The general direction of the governments however most likely leads into situation where the living is in ok levels only if you marry, mate, get together with someone instead of living single, alone - but not a lonely life. This can be seen on societies where consumer products are meant for families and not one person only. And banking is based on taking huge loans to buy a house.

Meanwhile many people are wanting to live more fulfilling li, this is opposite for building up a career, spending most of your time at work, and missing the life in the meantime.

Technological advances may also create situation where not everyone is able to have a job. Artificial intelligence, machine learning is potentially making that, to remove the need for repetitive worker. Making perhaps decisions in behalf of worker. Some say it creates more jobs, not removes them, but facf is that humans can concentrate into jobs requiring more creativity, however the old maxim is that not everyone gets to be astronaut. This means that not all will be eligible to get work, especially when the structure of corporations are handling less-skilled work.

Interesting is that freelancing, and similar way of working are actually making less money for government, economy in generla, which will weak the state even more, and can cause chain reactions into society, such as generic insafety.

Flynn effect describing the general IQ levels have been thought to be in declining IQ side for some time. Schools system generalizes people, not help them to reach their full potential. This also can lead into mediocrity citizenships - compare this into Artificial Intelligence taking our jobs.

Guaranteed minimum income, a citizen wage, is one solution to provide minimum salary, without specific work. This has created debates that people need to do something in order to gain that. But what? Would this allow e.g artists to be more creative when not having burden to produce, philosophers and others to think. Citizen wage also would allow people to pursue their own companies in safety knowing there is still something to fall on if their startup does not fly off.

ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guaranteed_minimum_income
Guaranteed minimum income (GMI) (also called minimum income) is a system of social welfare provision that guarantees that all citizens or families have an income sufficient to live on, provided they meet certain conditions

Oh and that jobbigt on the title? It is swedish for being hard, difficult

Mistreatments

The constantly evolving world can make it constantly more difficult to live. This is seen when existing, perhaps, simple approaches and areas are becoming more complex, due evolution, interconnection - and lack of changed or more correct approaches. This can be seen on many industries, but mainly within those who could be thought to be non-linear.

Healthcare is one non-linear area. On it, cost cuttings have naturally emerged, also increased queues, long waiting times to treatments which also can endanger the patient. Similarly, there is no real comprehensive examination of patients when the reserved time is 20 minutes, for one symptom, about what patient does not necessarily know of, and therefore is unable to connect the dots to possible other issues.

One could question if the work changing into the “sports” has caused losing the patient.

An example from the life of a newly diagnosed diabetic which I did found out.

• Very blunt approach without taking things into the context, like how this person takes bad news, or does he have any information about matter. Yin is patient, Yang is the sickness with all the secondary symptoms.
• Misdiagnosis, to not look the blood tests as a holistic issue, missing the point about long range sugar.
• Not checking baselines. Diabetic may have other issues that she or he may not be aware of due not knowing being diabetic earlier. Due this reason it is very good to check baseline for sensing on legs, eyesight, Dupuytren's contracture - or at least tell the person that these symptoms are good to follow and try to prevent. Checking those and putting into baseline one can follow if and how the actual sickness may worsen the health of the patient.
  Diabetic without proper treatment, can lead to multiple secondary sicknesses and issues, such as things with heart, amputation, eyesight, nervoussystems and so fort and those will become very expensive for the state to handle. Therefore it should be utmost imporance for the state to treat diabetic well, to prevent upcoming costs to happen - which also allows people to stay at work, ensuring tax money for the state. Unfortunately, only short term decisions are typically made.

Is this a sign of our times? No proper healthcare anymore.

Do you feel being mistreated?