Interesting (bias?) about Einstein's brain:
http://guardianlv.com/2013/10/einsteins-corpus-callosum-explains-his-genius-level-intellect/
If only looking explanation about the Corpus Callosum - area, it
naturally can direct thoughts, but when reading the the below links
about lack of it, one could hypothesize about confirmation bias
(and also what tends to be a problem in machine learning without weighting context / "intelligence" offerings by e.g some security vendots).
http://www.space.com/519-nasa-studying-rain-man-brain.html
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-superhuman-mind/201212/kim-peek-the-real-rain-man
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2286592/How-Rain-Mans-brain-REALLY-worked-New-scans-reveal-makeup-patients-similar-condition.html
Naturally neither existance, or lack of it is only a one variable in
equation, as "gifts" can be thought to be different, and might be more individual than general and might need to require to research more thanindividual parts (it may be difficult to understand universe when looking one planet only).
- Posted using BlogPress from my iPad
